Sample collection method impacts result
The method used to collect samples can have significant impacts on the resulting data collected and analyzed. Whether swabbing equipment, collecting air samples, or extracting biological matter, the collection process must minimize contamination and changes to the original state of the sample. Consistent and standardized collection techniques are important for business analysis methods like production quality control and safety compliance testing to generate accurate and reproducible results. Small variations in collection can skew numbers and waste resources on unnecessary re-testing. Developing strict sample handling standard operating procedures helps maximize the value of analysis efforts.
Proper storage prevents sample degradation
Many compounds and biological materials continue active processes even after collection if not stabilized. Improper or delayed storage can allow degradation, contamination, or concentration changes before analysis. Prompt preservation with techniques like freezing, drying, or addition of stabilizing chemicals protects the integrity of samples for business needs. Sample Preparation container and environmental requirements like refrigeration or exclusion of light also maintain the original state. Documenting detailed storage conditions provides full traceability of analytical results. Unexpected storage issues could otherwise require repeating sampling and analysis.
Representative subsampling ensures valid results
Large samples need to be divided uniformly to obtain an aliquot representative of the whole for testing. Without proper subsampling, isolated pockets with abnormal levels could falsely influence characterization. Homogenization of heterogeneous samples avoids such sampling errors. Whether sieving, blending, or other physical mixing, representative subsampling involves multiple increments from throughout to minimize bias from uneven distribution. Standardized subsampling SOPs produce consistent data for comparing over time or across multiple analysts.
Appropriate preparation minimizes matrix effects
Interfering constituents in analyzed samples can impact results through “matrix effects” if not properly addressed in the preparation stage. Removing, isolating, or correcting for interfering substances provides a pure fraction for accurate quantification. Extraction techniques separate and concentrate analytes of interest from complex matrices like soil, plant matter, biological fluids. Digestion and dissolution methods dissolve solid materials into homogeneous liquid solutions compatible with analytical instruments. Proper sample preparation minimizes variables affecting precision and accuracy of business data.
Process validation ensures defensible results
Quality control samples test each stage of sample handling, storage, and preparation to identify potential issues before actual analysis. Spiked samples quantify recovery from preparation steps to check for losses or contamination. Method validation studies prove a process consistently provides reliable results meeting intended use needs like pass/fail compliance testing or production monitoring over time. Documenting each QC check point provides full audit trail and defensibility of business data used for impactful decisions. Strict adherence to validated SOPs maintains data integrity.
Implementing robust standards and controls over sample collection, handling, storage, subsampling, and preparation provides business data users confidence in the analytical results. Protocols should aim to maintain sample integrity from the field or process through final instrumental analysis. Minimizing sources of error and bias optimizes investments in analysis programs for production, safety, and regulatory compliance.
Gets More Insights on: Sample Preparation
